<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Successful Demonstration of Carbon Dioxide Air Capture</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seekerblog.com/2007/04/28/successful-demonstration-of-carbon-dioxide-air-capture/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seekerblog.com/2007/04/28/successful-demonstration-of-carbon-dioxide-air-capture/</link>
	<description>Seeking reliable, objective sources on economics and energy-policy issues</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 09:48:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://seekerblog.com/2007/04/28/successful-demonstration-of-carbon-dioxide-air-capture/#comment-485</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 05:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seekerblog.com/archives/20070428/successful-demonstration-of-carbon-dioxide-air-capture/#comment-485</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Air capture is easy in principle, sure.

But what about the energy requirements of this process? I note that the it involves heating the Calcium hydroxide (calcium bicarbonate or Calcium carbonate I would have thought - High School chemistry) to 900 degrees C to drive off the CO2 and regenerate the Calcium hydroxide [Ca(OH0)2]

This is going to require a considerable amount of energy, the generation of which could conceivably involve further CO2 emissions. In order for this to work, you&#039;d need to virtually duplicate the existing power generation infrastructure to supply the energy needed to regenerate the Ca(OH)2.

Whilst technically feasible, how can it work in practice?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Air capture is easy in principle, sure.</p>
<p>But what about the energy requirements of this process? I note that the it involves heating the Calcium hydroxide (calcium bicarbonate or Calcium carbonate I would have thought &#8211; High School chemistry) to 900 degrees C to drive off the CO2 and regenerate the Calcium hydroxide [Ca(OH0)2]</p>
<p>This is going to require a considerable amount of energy, the generation of which could conceivably involve further CO2 emissions. In order for this to work, you&#8217;d need to virtually duplicate the existing power generation infrastructure to supply the energy needed to regenerate the Ca(OH)2.</p>
<p>Whilst technically feasible, how can it work in practice?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Simple Solution to Carbon Emissions at After Gutenberg</title>
		<link>http://seekerblog.com/2007/04/28/successful-demonstration-of-carbon-dioxide-air-capture/#comment-484</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A Simple Solution to Carbon Emissions at After Gutenberg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2007 21:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seekerblog.com/archives/20070428/successful-demonstration-of-carbon-dioxide-air-capture/#comment-484</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] 3Successful Demonstration of Carbon Dioxide Air Capture [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 3Successful Demonstration of Carbon Dioxide Air Capture [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

