Comments on: Ethanol Fuel is not so Green http://seekerblog.com/2008/02/07/ethanol-fuel-is-not-so-green/ Seeking reliable, objective sources on economics and energy-policy issues Sat, 26 May 2012 07:02:25 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Steve Darden http://seekerblog.com/2008/02/07/ethanol-fuel-is-not-so-green/#comment-652 Fri, 08 Feb 2008 16:42:56 +0000 http://seekerblog.com/archives/20080207/ethanol-fuel-is-not-so-green/#comment-652 Thanks for your correction. I should have written “ethanol mandates/subsidies are not the answer”. Nor are mandates for any source of energy. The least costly way to reduce GHG emissions is a revenue-neutral carbon tax — so that companies can confidently predict the comparative returns of new investments.

For a comprehensive demonstration of the bad economics of such policies see this new post.

]]> By: Al Fin http://seekerblog.com/2008/02/07/ethanol-fuel-is-not-so-green/#comment-651 Fri, 08 Feb 2008 14:05:11 +0000 http://seekerblog.com/archives/20080207/ethanol-fuel-is-not-so-green/#comment-651 Actually, it is government mandates for corn/maize ethanol that are not green. Ethanol technology itself is skipping ahead fairly quickly.

While corn ethanol returns 1.5 unit of energy for every 1.0 unit invested, advanced ethanol from biomass and other feedstocks can return between 8 and 12 units of energy for every 1.0 unit invested. Sugar cane supposedly returns about 10 (EROEI).

]]>