Economics is Easy; Comedy is Hard

Do not miss this terrific piece by Barry Ritholz — following is just a teaser:

(…) economics is to important to leave to just anyone. Even economists.

Towards that end, and to further illuminate our discussion, I suggest the following questions be used for all economic PhD candidates in their qualifying exams:

True or False: Humans act to obtain the highest possible well-being for themselves given available information about opportunities and other constraints, both natural and institutional, on their ability to achieve predetermined goals.
-Explain your answer in real world practice, rather than theoretical, terms.

• Starting in 2001, the FOMC started a monetary accommodation that took rates to the lowest levels in over 40 years, and then kept them there for 3 years. Discuss the economic and market impact of these rates. Include commodities, residential real estate, and financial derivatives in your answer.

• Almost the entirety of the economics profession missed the 2008 recession, the worst in many decades, in advance. Why?

• Nobel Laureate Joseph Stiglitz wrote: “The Chicago School [of economics] bears the blame for providing a seeming intellectual foundation for the idea that markets are self- adjusting and the best role for government is to do nothing.” Discuss the intellectual errors of The Chicago School, from Milton Friedman forwards.
For Booth School of Business PhD candidates ONLY: Why is the rest of the world wrong, and your belief system correct?

Read more »



Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 86 other followers