Iraq: What did U.S. intelligence tell the Clinton administration on the nuclear reconstitution issue?

Another bit of true history - Daniel McKivergan answers that question:

Well, Kenneth Pollack, former National Security Council official in the Clinton administration, commented in the January/February 2004 issue of The Atlantic Monthly on what U.S. intelligence believed regarding Iraq’s nuclear program:

The U.S. Intelligence Community’s belief toward the end of the Clinton Administration [was] that Iraq had reconstituted its nuclear weapons program and was close to acquiring nuclear weapons….

And, he also wrote:

In the late spring of 2002 I participated in a Washington meeting about Iraqi WMD. Those present included nearly twenty former inspectors from the United Nations Special Commission (UNSCOM), the force established in 1991 to oversee the elimination of WMD in Iraq. One of the senior people put a question to the group: Did anyone in the room doubt that Iraq was currently operating a secret centrifuge plant? No one did. Three people added that they believed Iraq was also operating a secret calutron plant (a facility for separating uranium isotopes).

The first Pollack quote is from his excellent Atlantic article “Spies, Lies, and Weapons: What Went Wrong“.

For reference, I archived the NYT article containing the second Pollack quote “Saddam’s Bombs? We’ll Find Them”, which sadly has fallen into the “NYT Select” black hole. A free version is at Brookings - it’s worthwhile rereading to get a more complete picture of the Clinton administration viewpoint:


These episodes, and others like them, explain why many former Clinton administration officials, including myself (I was on the staff of the National Security Council in the 90’s), agreed with the Bush administration that a war would likely be necessary to prevent Iraq from acquiring nuclear and other weapons. We may not have agreed with the Bush team’s timing or tactics, but none of us doubted the fundamental intelligence basis of its concerns about the Iraqi threat.

As for the estimates the Bush administration presented regarding Iraq’s holdings of weapons-related materials, they came from unchallenged evidence gathered by United Nations inspectors (in many cases, from records of the companies that sold the materials to Iraq in the first place). For instance, Iraq admitted importing 200 to 250 tons of precursor agents for VX nerve gas; it claimed to have destroyed these chemicals but never proved that it had done so. Even Hans Blix, the last head weapons inspector and a leading skeptic of the need for an invasion, admitted that the Iraqis refused to provide a credible accounting for these materials.

And it wasn’t just the United States that was concerned about Iraq’s efforts. By 2002, British, Israeli and German intelligence services had also concluded that Iraq was probably far enough along in its nuclear weapons program that it would be able to put together one or more bombs at some point in the second half of this decade.
The Germans were actually the most fearful of all - in 2001 they leaked their estimate that Iraq might be able to develop its first workable nuclear device in 2004. [Ed, the above quote follows here]

0 Responses to “Iraq: What did U.S. intelligence tell the Clinton administration on the nuclear reconstitution issue?”


  1. No Comments

Leave a Reply






Bad Behavior has blocked 3726 access attempts in the last 7 days.