<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who should you vote for?  Heed Vote Chooser!</title>
	<link>http://seekerblog.com/archives/20080201/who-should-you-vote-for-heed-vote-chooser/</link>
	<description>Seeking reliable, objective sources on economics, foreign-policy and energy-policy issues.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 23:46:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: spseth</title>
		<link>http://seekerblog.com/archives/20080201/who-should-you-vote-for-heed-vote-chooser/#comment-26445</link>
		<dc:creator>spseth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 23:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://seekerblog.com/archives/20080201/who-should-you-vote-for-heed-vote-chooser/#comment-26445</guid>
		<description>It's definitely not a fair test...   Start by looking at the first question...
Was invading Iraq a mistake?...
"INVADING IRAQ?" This could have easily been asked more appropriately.
Try...  Was liberating Iraq a mistake?
Obviously two different feelings about the same topic...  Asking the question "was invading Iraq a mistake" draws you to make a specific conclusion if you don't already have a strong feeling about the situation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s definitely not a fair test&#8230;   Start by looking at the first question&#8230;<br />
Was invading Iraq a mistake?&#8230;<br />
&#8220;INVADING IRAQ?&#8221; This could have easily been asked more appropriately.<br />
Try&#8230;  Was liberating Iraq a mistake?<br />
Obviously two different feelings about the same topic&#8230;  Asking the question &#8220;was invading Iraq a mistake&#8221; draws you to make a specific conclusion if you don&#8217;t already have a strong feeling about the situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Darden</title>
		<link>http://seekerblog.com/archives/20080201/who-should-you-vote-for-heed-vote-chooser/#comment-20179</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Darden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 11:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://seekerblog.com/archives/20080201/who-should-you-vote-for-heed-vote-chooser/#comment-20179</guid>
		<description>Interesting... I just tested Vote Chooser again -- it appears they've changed the logic, as I submitted same choices, but got Huckabee, Clinton, McCain [6,5,5] this time.

FWIW, an agreement score of 5 = 50%, indicating the core problem with this field of candidates: none are acceptable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting&#8230; I just tested Vote Chooser again &#8212; it appears they&#8217;ve changed the logic, as I submitted same choices, but got Huckabee, Clinton, McCain [6,5,5] this time.</p>
<p>FWIW, an agreement score of 5 = 50%, indicating the core problem with this field of candidates: none are acceptable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M. E. Johnson</title>
		<link>http://seekerblog.com/archives/20080201/who-should-you-vote-for-heed-vote-chooser/#comment-20158</link>
		<dc:creator>M. E. Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 04:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://seekerblog.com/archives/20080201/who-should-you-vote-for-heed-vote-chooser/#comment-20158</guid>
		<description>Voter Chooser is not kosher....I am veeeery conservative and it selected Hillary Clinton for me....I had to fudge to get McCain or Obama.  I could not get Huckabee.  I think this was published by someone in the Clinton camp...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Voter Chooser is not kosher&#8230;.I am veeeery conservative and it selected Hillary Clinton for me&#8230;.I had to fudge to get McCain or Obama.  I could not get Huckabee.  I think this was published by someone in the Clinton camp&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
