McCain vs Obama: Ethanol, fighting the special interests

A gold star for McCain — honesty on ethanol subsidies — thanks to Greg Mankiw for the link to David Brooks

In 2000, McCain ran for president and reiterated his longstanding opposition to ethanol subsidies. Though it crippled his chances in Iowa, he argued that ethanol was a wasteful giveaway. A recent study in the journal Science has shown that when you take all impacts into consideration, ethanol consumption increases greenhouse gas emissions compared with regular gasoline. Unlike, say, Barack Obama, McCain still opposes ethanol subsidies.

Off the ethanol topic, Brooks reminds us of McCain’s honesty in his long term fight against special interests;

You wouldn’t know it to look at them, but political consultants are as faddish as anyone else. And the current vogueish advice among the backroom set is: Go after your opponent’s strengths. So in the first volley of what feels like the general election campaign, Barack Obama has attacked John McCain for being too close to lobbyists. His assault is part of this week’s Democratic chorus: McCain isn’t really the anti-special interest reformer he pretends to be. He’s more tainted than his reputation suggests.

Well, anything is worth trying, I suppose, but there is the little problem of his record. McCain has fought one battle after another against lobbyists and special interests. And while I don’t have space to describe all his tussles, or even the lesser ones like his fight with the agricultural lobby against sugar subsidies, I thought that, amidst all these charges, it might be worth noting some of the McCain highlights from the past dozen years.

RTWT — I had forgotten some of these courageous stands.

…Over the course of his career, McCain has tried to do the impossible. He has challenged the winds of the money gale. He has sometimes failed and fallen short. And there have always been critics who cherry-pick his compromises, ignore his larger efforts and accuse him of being a hypocrite.

This is, of course, the gospel of the mediocre man: to ridicule somebody who tries something difficult on the grounds that the effort was not a total success. But any decent person who looks at the McCain record sees that while he has certainly faltered at times, he has also battled concentrated power more doggedly than any other legislator. If this is the record of a candidate with lobbyists on his campaign bus, then every candidate should have lobbyists on the bus.

And here’s the larger point: We’re going to have two extraordinary nominees for president this year. This could be one of the great general election campaigns in American history. The only thing that could ruin it is if the candidates become demagogues and hurl accusations at each other that are an insult to reality and common sense.

Maybe Obama can start this campaign over.

3 Responses to “McCain vs Obama: Ethanol, fighting the special interests”


  1. 1 Paul

    What are McCain’s, Hillary’s, and Obama’s positions on 1) ending the appx. 51 cent per gallon subsidy on ethanol made from corn and 2) ending the appx 54 cent per gallon tax on ethanol imported from Brazil ?

  2. 2 Steve Darden

    Paul,

    Excellent question. I wrote back in February on the trade-related voting records of McCain, Clinton and Obama. Conversely, both Dem candidates have horrible records [i.e., “never met a subsidy they didn’t like”] More at Cato’s freetrade.org, where you can research any senator’s voting record down to the detail of particular bills.

    Steve

  3. 3 Raj Grewal

    I’m pretty sure McCain switched his position on ethanol. http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/2006/11/13/8393132/index.htm

Leave a Reply






Bad Behavior has blocked 21602 access attempts in the last 7 days.