<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Maliki: &#8216;The Tenure of Coalition Troops in Iraq Should Be Limited&#8217;</title>
	<link>http://seekerblog.com/archives/20080719/maliki-the-tenure-of-coalition-troops-in-iraq-should-be-limited/</link>
	<description>Seeking reliable, objective sources on economics, foreign-policy and energy-policy issues.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 04:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://seekerblog.com/archives/20080719/maliki-the-tenure-of-coalition-troops-in-iraq-should-be-limited/#comment-26837</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 19:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://seekerblog.com/archives/20080719/maliki-the-tenure-of-coalition-troops-in-iraq-should-be-limited/#comment-26837</guid>
		<description>Bush deserves no credit here.  He let thousands of Iraqis die on his watch for 3.5 years of war.  He failed to prosecute an adequate counter insurgency, failed to make the proper policy decisions on disbanding the army, promoting peace and stability (instead of looting), and protecting Iraq from the establishment of terrorist organizations like Bin Laden's.  All these things occurred on Bush's watch and were the result of failed policy in Iraq.  Not to mention the low-grade civil war that took place in 2005-06.

Bush finally put someone who knows how to fight a war like this, General Petraeus, in charge.  And somehow Bush deserves the credit?  I guess that's fair, considering about 2,500 troops, about a half million Iraqis, and billions of dollars were spent while he took 3.5 years to figure out what needed to be done.

Bush failed in Iraq, this country owes General Petraeus a debt of gratitude for bailing us out.  Bush deserves no credit--we saw what his "leadership" of the Iraq war led to: mass murder, terrorism, and IEDs.  He sat there with his pecker in his hand for 3.5 years, and now we are supposed to what?  Thank him?

This is not to say the Democrats are not failures and that the Democrats are betting on failure in Iraq.  They are useless cowards that go with the political winds.  They are just as responsible for getting us into this mess and for the costs of this war as Bush.

The infuriating here is if the right decision was made to put a general trained and an expert in counter insurgency in charge in the first place, we could have avoided the bloody mess Iraq became.  In fact, we would have been better off because the country would not have been so severely ravaged by war. We paid a high price for Bush's stupidity and on the job training.

It will take far more than 3.5 years to rebuild what was destroyed in that time due to Bush "greeted as liberators" incompetence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bush deserves no credit here.  He let thousands of Iraqis die on his watch for 3.5 years of war.  He failed to prosecute an adequate counter insurgency, failed to make the proper policy decisions on disbanding the army, promoting peace and stability (instead of looting), and protecting Iraq from the establishment of terrorist organizations like Bin Laden&#8217;s.  All these things occurred on Bush&#8217;s watch and were the result of failed policy in Iraq.  Not to mention the low-grade civil war that took place in 2005-06.</p>
<p>Bush finally put someone who knows how to fight a war like this, General Petraeus, in charge.  And somehow Bush deserves the credit?  I guess that&#8217;s fair, considering about 2,500 troops, about a half million Iraqis, and billions of dollars were spent while he took 3.5 years to figure out what needed to be done.</p>
<p>Bush failed in Iraq, this country owes General Petraeus a debt of gratitude for bailing us out.  Bush deserves no credit&#8211;we saw what his &#8220;leadership&#8221; of the Iraq war led to: mass murder, terrorism, and IEDs.  He sat there with his pecker in his hand for 3.5 years, and now we are supposed to what?  Thank him?</p>
<p>This is not to say the Democrats are not failures and that the Democrats are betting on failure in Iraq.  They are useless cowards that go with the political winds.  They are just as responsible for getting us into this mess and for the costs of this war as Bush.</p>
<p>The infuriating here is if the right decision was made to put a general trained and an expert in counter insurgency in charge in the first place, we could have avoided the bloody mess Iraq became.  In fact, we would have been better off because the country would not have been so severely ravaged by war. We paid a high price for Bush&#8217;s stupidity and on the job training.</p>
<p>It will take far more than 3.5 years to rebuild what was destroyed in that time due to Bush &#8220;greeted as liberators&#8221; incompetence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
