This is a really excellent and useful tip sheet from statistician Nick Barrowman. Really, check it out - you’ll be glad you did…
Search
Latest Posts
RSS- First reactions to Obama speech at GMU
- Congestion pricing and The Smart Grid
- Street Smart: Competition, Entrepreneurship, and the Future of Roads
- Econtalk = best podcast?
- Economists v. Historians on the New Deal and the Great Depression
- CEO Eric Schmidt wishes he could rescue newspapers
- How did the tax cut get so big?
- Quantifying the USD-oil link
- Boost Private Investment to Boost the Economy
- The SoCal Foreclosure Market
Latest Comments
RSS- JoAnne Taylor on the post School choice: where are Obama’s children educated?
- Recent Links Tagged With "operating" - JabberTags on the post China wants 100 Westinghouse AP1000 operating or under construction by 2020
- Kurt Schwindelberger on the post Oops: will GreenFuels biodiesel scheme work?
- gnomædh on the post Suspense Builds in the Automotive X Prize ‘Green Prix’
- Ray Bright on the post Shai Agassi: He could sell camels to Saudi Arabia
- Samuel Baker on the post KPMG: The Impact of a Financial Contagion
- Ditech Home Loans on the post The Rise and Fall of Subprime Mortgages
- Dr B B L Madhukar on the post Toshiba 4S reactor for Galena Alaska
- Chintan on the post Why is the TIPS yield curve inverted?
- Manuel on the post CDS: zero sum game, not
Category List
- Afghanistan (47)
- Africa (9)
- Al Qaeda (144)
- Apple (51)
- Avian Flu (29)
- Biology (17)
- Biotechnology (28)
- China (17)
- CIA (53)
- Climate Change (255)
- Climate Science (45)
- Constitution (11)
- Counter Terrorism (309)
- Cruising (1)
- Democracy (39)
- Economics (893)
- Education (81)
- Energy Policy (482)
- Entrepreneurship (20)
- EU (40)
- Financial Crisis (289)
- Fisheries Policy (5)
- Foreign Aid (3)
- Foreign Policy (264)
- France (21)
- General (45)
- Germany (2)
- Global Warming (194)
- Globalization (4)
- Healthcare (125)
- History (31)
- Homeland Security (50)
- Iran (147)
- Iraq (999)
- Iraq Oil (18)
- Islam (124)
- Israel (123)
- Katrina (31)
- Lebanon (61)
- Media (264)
- Middle East (105)
- Military (80)
- National debt (12)
- North Korea (18)
- NSA Intercepts (37)
- Nuclear Power (23)
- Palestine (41)
- Politics (392)
- Russia (11)
- Saudi (24)
- School Choice (23)
- Science (53)
- Science Policy (76)
- Space (9)
- Technology (422)
- Torture (6)
- True_False (6)
- U.K. (11)
- U.N. (23)
- Venezuela (3)
- Vietnam (16)
- Water Policy (1)
- What are you optimistic about? (12)
- World Health (4)
- X Prize (12)
Links
Links
- American Future
- Augean Stables
- Austin Bay
- Belgravia Dispatch
- Belmont Club
- Chicago Boyz
- Cori Dauber
- Counterterrorism Blog
- Crossroads Arabia
- David’s Medienktritik
- Foreign Policy Blog
- Harry’s Place
- Homeland Security Watch
- Jeff Jarvis
- Jim Miller on Politics
- Messopotamian
- Neo-Neocon
- OxBlog
- Press Think
- Prometheus-Science Policy
- Second Draft
- Spirit of America
- Sunlight Foundation
- Tigerhawk
- Winds of Change

Yes but no. Forcing the y-axis origin to be zero, in the author’s bar-chart example is not necessarily a good, or necessarily a more honest, idea. The range of 2.5 in the density example may be significant, and if so it may be more misleading to plot the data with a y-axis origin of zero as this would visually underrepresent the variability.
Same principle applies to the x-axis of a chart. In time-series, of course the origin and scale of the x-axis are chosen depending on what interval or process one is trying to represent. Following the suggestion of a zero-origin rule literally, a chart of the last ten years’ of any financial data set (say, the DJIA) would have to start at the year Zero A.D.?!?! In which case the chart would be unreadable, in itself a potentially misleading representation.
In your examples, including the origin obscures the content. In such cases, I understood the author’s advice was to use line or XY-scatter charts, instead of bar charts. Because bar charts were only suitable for presentation of “variables that are measured on ratio scales”.
Does that make sense?