Anti-pipeline activists: “give us what we want or these two won’t like it”

NewImage

Canadian Chemist Blair King recently reposted “The Machiavellian battle against climate change using Energy East”. Excerpt:

…When I have pointed out that shutting down the pipeline will only force more oil to be transported by rail I was met with the point that rail cars are visible while oil moving in a pipeline is not. When I pointed out that the oil trains pose a greater risk to human health and the environment I got the distressing response that

“these tactics effectively apply pressure to reassess the fossil fuelled system as a whole, i.e. we’ll see what happens to any remaining social license when oil trains start blowing up left, right and centre”.

Yes I am as shocked about that statement as you are. In two sentences it is acknowledged that they know that by fighting the pipelines they guarantee that there will be more spills and that they are essentially counting on those spills, and their ensuing ecological devastation and potential for loss of human lives, to degrade the social license of the oil industry. Metaphorically it is like they are holding up a grandma and a newborn kitten and saying “give us what we want or these two won’t like it”. I honestly had no clue how to respond.

It’s obvious to observers of energy policy that the highly visible protests about oil pipelines can’t be about pipelines. Like Blair King I’ve assumed the pipelines were a calculated proxy war. The pipeline is an easy target, a symbol that TV cameras like. Surely the activists know that stopping a pipeline just makes the human and environmental damages worse.

The possibility I had not considered is the activists know perfectly well how damaging their stated objective is.

 

4 thoughts on “Anti-pipeline activists: “give us what we want or these two won’t like it”

  1. It looks as though to stop the transporting of oil they are willing to put innocent people at risk of a horrible death. That attitude is inexcusable.

    Whether it is reasonable to get oil from the tar sands is another issue but surely innocent people should not be put as risk to stop it.

  2. Lovely, Fred!

    I shared the link to your shop on Facebook. The background photo on your shop is perfect. I think you are just missing a profile photo. It doesn’t have to be your face, just a box or something. Right now it shows up as a blank square.

    Love, E

  3. Lovely, Fred!

    I shared the link to your shop on Facebook. The background photo on your shop is perfect. I think you are just missing a profile photo. It doesn’t have to be your face, just a box or something. Right now it shows up as a blank square.

    Love, E

Comments are closed.